header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

A fair ride?

Nicholas Dobson rides the rollercoaster of public authority fairness

Parents and public authorities, although often at variance, do have something in common. Those aggrieved by their decisions are likely to cry (with greater or lesser degrees of sophistication) “It’s not fair!”. And while traditional judicial review may be unavailable in respect of parental decisions on bedtime, it certainly is in respect of unlawful decisions of governmental authorities.

And (by way of long evolution from the cardinal principles of natural justice) such authorities are expected to take decisions fairly. These principles are that no-one is to be a judge in their own cause (demotically, nemo iudex in causa sua) and the obligation to afford the parties a fair opportunity of presenting their respective views on the matters in issue (audi alteram partem—hear the other side).

The law of public authority fairness is part of an extensive suite of principles applied by the courts when supervising the decisions of public authorities to avoid potential abuse of power. These include Wednesbury reasonableness, the fiduciary duty, adherence to proper statutory purpose and human rights and equalities compliance. Fairness

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll