header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition

Zdinjak v Croatia [2012] All ER (D) 21 (Apr)

It was established law that the rule against double jeopardy operated as of right only where the offences were the same in both fact and law (the narrow jurisdiction). However, it was also established that the law recognised a broader duty to look at the facts of the case in considering whether the rule against double jeopardy should apply (the wider jurisdiction). Both the narrow and the wider jurisdiction were embraced by s 80 of the Extradition Act 2003.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll