header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , CPR
printer mail-detail

Expert assessment

How much do your experts know about the Civil Procedure Rules? Mark Solon investigates

It is the nightmare of every litigator to watch their expert cross examined and the expert revealing a lack of knowledge in their professional field. The credibility of the expert is demolished with potential catastrophic consequences for the case.

Knowledge

I have discussed in previous articles the necessity for careful selection of all experts and then making sure the expert really does have the right qualifications and experience for the issues in question.
However, since October last year, experts are also required to know the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Rules state that all experts’ reports must contain a statement that experts “are aware of the requirements of Pt 35 and Practice Direction 35, this protocol [the Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to Give Evidence in Civil Claims] and the practice direction on pre-action conduct”.

The Rules also state that: “Those intending to instruct experts to give or prepare evidence for the purpose of civil proceedings should consider whether expert evidence is appropriate, taking account of the principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll