header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , CPR
printer mail-detail

Expert assessment

How much do your experts know about the Civil Procedure Rules? Mark Solon investigates

It is the nightmare of every litigator to watch their expert cross examined and the expert revealing a lack of knowledge in their professional field. The credibility of the expert is demolished with potential catastrophic consequences for the case.

Knowledge

I have discussed in previous articles the necessity for careful selection of all experts and then making sure the expert really does have the right qualifications and experience for the issues in question.
However, since October last year, experts are also required to know the Civil Procedure Rules.

The Rules state that all experts’ reports must contain a statement that experts “are aware of the requirements of Pt 35 and Practice Direction 35, this protocol [the Protocol for the Instruction of Experts to Give Evidence in Civil Claims] and the practice direction on pre-action conduct”.

The Rules also state that: “Those intending to instruct experts to give or prepare evidence for the purpose of civil proceedings should consider whether expert evidence is appropriate, taking account of the principles

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll