header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Executive decision

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission.

The General Council of the Bar has publicised the possibility of litigation against the government and the Legal Services Commission. It complains of a lack of consultation and co-ordination in relation to proposed changes to the graduated fee and very high cost cases schemes.

The potential case echoes an earlier success of the Bar Council in the mid-1980s when its chairman was Lord Alexander of Weedon QC. Lord Hailsham folded when faced with a writ arguing that the then proposed level of remuneration was not consistent with the statutory provisions then current. The lord chancellor had, however, the last laugh: he abolished the statutory provisions and reinstated the cuts.

The Bar is making the most of its case. On 5 February, it announced that it was instructing solicitors. On 10 February, its solicitors wrote to Lord Bach and Sir Bill Callaghan “in order to advance proceedings”. We are promised “a full pre-action letter” shortly. We can anticipate another press release.
The real objection is, of course,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll