header-logo header-logo

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers exclusive jurisdiction clauses: the separability of such clauses and the consequences of an invalid contract

 

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

In a judgment extending the court's powers under exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Court of Appeal held that courts hearing contractual claims, made pursuant to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, may in the event that the contract is invalid also determine any alternative claims brought as a consequence of a finding that the contract is invalid.

Facts of the case

The claimant banks brought proceedings for repayment of monies under a credit agreement. The claimants asserted that the credit agreement contained a valid jurisdiction clause which complied with Art 23 of the Judgments Regulation 44/2001 (The Judgments Regulation) such that it should be regarded as an exclusive jurisdiction clause.

The defendants asserted that the credit agreement was void for want of authority.

The banks accordingly applied for permission to amend their claim to bring alternative claims in restitution and/or misrepresentation (the new claims) in the event that the credit agreement was found to be void.

Mr Justice Flaux refused the banks permission to amend.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll