header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

Janna Purdie considers exclusive jurisdiction clauses: the separability of such clauses and the consequences of an invalid contract

 

Exclusive jurisdiction clauses

In a judgment extending the court's powers under exclusive jurisdiction clauses, the Court of Appeal held that courts hearing contractual claims, made pursuant to an exclusive jurisdiction clause, may in the event that the contract is invalid also determine any alternative claims brought as a consequence of a finding that the contract is invalid.

Facts of the case

The claimant banks brought proceedings for repayment of monies under a credit agreement. The claimants asserted that the credit agreement contained a valid jurisdiction clause which complied with Art 23 of the Judgments Regulation 44/2001 (The Judgments Regulation) such that it should be regarded as an exclusive jurisdiction clause.

The defendants asserted that the credit agreement was void for want of authority.

The banks accordingly applied for permission to amend their claim to bring alternative claims in restitution and/or misrepresentation (the new claims) in the event that the credit agreement was found to be void.

Mr Justice Flaux refused the banks permission to amend.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll