header-logo header-logo

28 May 2009 / Joe Middleton
Issue: 7371 / Categories: Features , Public , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The exclusion net

Joe Middleton on recent exclusions under the Refugee Convention

* * * * * *

The Refugee Convention (the Covention) recognises that those who are guilty of very serious misconduct should not be entitled to surrogate protection, even if they have a genuine fear of persecution in their home countries.

Article 1(F) provides that the Convention does not apply if there are serious reasons for considering that a person has committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity (1F(a)), a serious nonpolitical crime (1F(b)) or acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations (1F((c)). Moreover, Art 33 provides that the prohibition of refoulement, which is at the heart of states' obligations under the Convention, does not apply if the person in question constitutes a danger to the community of the host country having been convicted of a particularly serious crime.

Exclusion from the scope of the Convention does not, of course, imply that the UK will remove a person to a place where they face the risk of persecution. If the risk is sufficiently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll