header-logo header-logo

10 March 2011 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Excluded no more

Andrew Francis considers a novel area of property law

The relationship between competition law and agreements affecting land (whether estates, or other interests therein) which have a bearing on competition law is an area of law which to most property lawyers is a novelty. Most of this law is now EU based, with the UK being required to interpret and apply that law consistently with EU practice; s 60 of the Competition Act 1998.

With effect from 6 April 2011, the Competition Act 1988 (Land Agreements Exclusion and Revocation) Order 2004 (SI 2004/1260) (the 2004 Order) will be revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreement Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709).

Some examples show the area of law where the effect of revocation might have to be considered.

(i) A covenant in a lease granted by L District Council restricts use to offices. The market for such offices is competitive in the area of the property let. X co wants to use part of the building as a shop but L DC refuses.

(ii) A plc is developing one of its sites which it owns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll