header-logo header-logo

10 March 2011 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Excluded no more

Andrew Francis considers a novel area of property law

The relationship between competition law and agreements affecting land (whether estates, or other interests therein) which have a bearing on competition law is an area of law which to most property lawyers is a novelty. Most of this law is now EU based, with the UK being required to interpret and apply that law consistently with EU practice; s 60 of the Competition Act 1998.

With effect from 6 April 2011, the Competition Act 1988 (Land Agreements Exclusion and Revocation) Order 2004 (SI 2004/1260) (the 2004 Order) will be revoked by the Competition Act 1998 (Land Agreement Exclusion Revocation) Order 2010 (SI 2010/1709).

Some examples show the area of law where the effect of revocation might have to be considered.

(i) A covenant in a lease granted by L District Council restricts use to offices. The market for such offices is competitive in the area of the property let. X co wants to use part of the building as a shop but L DC refuses.

(ii) A plc is developing one of its sites which it owns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll