header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Excellent” immigration cases blocked?

Lawyers express dismay at MoJ legal aid plans

Proposed changes to legal aid will block immigration cases with “excellent prospects of success”, lawyers have warned.

Proposals for a residence test for civil legal aid and reduced legal aid funding for judicial review are set out in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation, Transforming Legal Aid, which closes on 4 June.

In its response this week, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) said the proposals would result in people with good cases being unable to bring them because they cannot pay or, if eligible for legal aid, are unable to find a lawyer.

Under the residence test, legal aid applicants other than asylum seekers must show “strong connections” to the UK and have lived here lawfully for a year.

ILPA said the proposal to pay providers only for judicial review applications would “undermine the use of pre-action protocols” and make it more difficult for people to find representation.

An MoJ spokesperson says: “There will be some exceptions to the residence test. We would also ensure that legal aid would continue to be available where necessary to comply with obligations under EU or international law.”

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll