header-logo header-logo

02 May 2013
Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

“Excellent” immigration cases blocked?

Lawyers express dismay at MoJ legal aid plans

Proposed changes to legal aid will block immigration cases with “excellent prospects of success”, lawyers have warned.

Proposals for a residence test for civil legal aid and reduced legal aid funding for judicial review are set out in the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation, Transforming Legal Aid, which closes on 4 June.

In its response this week, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) said the proposals would result in people with good cases being unable to bring them because they cannot pay or, if eligible for legal aid, are unable to find a lawyer.

Under the residence test, legal aid applicants other than asylum seekers must show “strong connections” to the UK and have lived here lawfully for a year.

ILPA said the proposal to pay providers only for judicial review applications would “undermine the use of pre-action protocols” and make it more difficult for people to find representation.

An MoJ spokesperson says: “There will be some exceptions to the residence test. We would also ensure that legal aid would continue to be available where necessary to comply with obligations under EU or international law.”

Issue: 7558 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll