header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010 / Philippa Charles , Daniel Hart
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The evolution of Rome

Cross-border litigation in the EU examined by Philippa Charles & Daniel Hart

The law which governs such contracts is a crucial issue. It can affect what the obligations of the parties are and the circumstances in which the contract may be terminated. It can even determine whether a claim can be made for breach, since limitation periods differ under the laws of different countries.

Governing law in contract claims—Rome I

For contracts concluded after 17 December 2009, the rules for determining the law applicable to contractual obligations will be found in a new Regulation No 593/2008 (known as Rome I). It replaces the Rome Convention of 1980.

Rome I generally mirrors the main principles of the Rome Convention. However, it does make some additions and alterations. The key changes are noted below.

Choice of law made by the parties

The key tenet of Rome I remains that a choice of law made by the parties will generally be upheld (A3(1)). However, other laws may nevertheless be applied in some circumstances. While this was also the case under the Rome Convention, Rome

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll