header-logo header-logo

Evidence

15 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Kimathi and others v Foreign and Commonwealth Office [2016] EWHC 3004 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 26 (Dec)

The Queen’s Bench Division dismissed the defendant Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s application to cross-examine 11 translators, who had translated witness statements of a group of Kenyans who had brought an action against it. The court held that, under CPR 32.2(3)(b), the court could control how evidence was to be given, such that there was no absolute entitlement to cross-examine a witness. The court held, by reference to the principles of case management and furthering the overriding objective, that, on the facts, it was not just and/or proportionate to accede to the defendant’s application.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll