header-logo header-logo

13 April 2007
Issue: 7268 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Evans loses final frozen embryo court battle

Natallie Evans’s legal bid to have a child using embryos which were frozen before she was made infertile by cancer treatment has been knocked back by the Grand Chamber of the European Court.

Natallie Evans’s legal bid to have a child using embryos which were frozen before she was made infertile by cancer treatment has been knocked back by the Grand Chamber of the European Court.

The embryos were created after she had IVF treatment with her partner Howard Johnston. However, he withdrew his consent to use them after the couple split in 2002.

UK laws allow either party to withdraw consent up to the point where the embryos are implanted. Evans argued that Johnston had already consented to the embryos’ creation, storage and use, and should not be allowed to change his mind.

 However, that argument—which has already been rejected by the High Court and the European Court of Human Rights—has been dismissed by the Grand Chamber.

Following a unanimous ruling, the 17 human rights judges said in a statement this week that the court “did not consider that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll