header-logo header-logo

13 December 2024 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8098 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Health
printer mail-detail

Euthanasia: an ancient debate

200989
As the Bill progresses through Parliament, Athelstane Aamodt looks back at millennia of arguments for & against assisted dying

The name of Jack Kevorkian is little-remembered these days. But in 1998, Kevorkian, nicknamed ‘Dr Death’ by the media, went on trial for the second-degree murder of a man called Thomas Youk. Mr Youk was suffering from motor neurone disease, and Dr Kevorkian’s crime was that he participated in the voluntary euthanasia of his patient. Kevorkian also claimed that he had assisted 130 patients to end their lives because they were suffering from terminal illnesses.

Kevorkian and his case were a cause célèbre (he was convicted and sent to prison), but the arguments about voluntary euthanasia and assisted dying (which are not the same thing) have not gone away. Indeed, the fact that different countries have different laws on such matters, and the foundation of the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland, have ensured that such arguments have remained loud and heartfelt.

Assistance to end life

At the moment, the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is making its way through Parliament.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll