header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Union—Privilege—Legal professional privilege

Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd and another v European Commission C-550/07 P, [2010] All ER (D) 72 (Sep)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Skouris (President), Tizzano, Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot, Silva de Lapuerta (Rapporteur), and Levits (Presidents of Chamber), Rosas, Lohmus, Safjan and Svaby, 29 Apr 2010

In relation to Legal Professional Privilege (LPP), in-house lawyers are in a fundamentally different position from external lawyers, so that their respective circumstances are not comparable.
In February 2003, the Commission ordered the applicants to submit to an investigation aimed at seeking evidence of possible anti-competitive practices. To that end, Commission officials carried out an investigation at the applicants’ premises. They took copies of a considerable number of documents.

The applicants’ representatives informed the officials that certain documents were likely to be covered by the protection of confidentiality of communications between lawyers and their clients. It was decided that the leader of the investigating team would briefly examine the documents in question. During the examination of the documents in question, a dispute arose in relation to five documents.

After obtaining the applicants’ observations concerning the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll