header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

European Union—Freedom of movement—Television broadcasting

Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others: C-403/08 and C-429/08, [2011] All ER (D) 26 (Oct)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Tizzano, Cunha Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot, Arabadjiev and Kasel (Presidents of Chambers), Borg Barthet, Ilesic, Malenovsky (Rapporteur) and Von Danwitz, 4 Oct 2011

The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constitute a restriction on competition prohibited by Art 101 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union where they oblige the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to that right holder’s protected subject matter with a view to their use outside the territory covered by that licence agreement.

The Football Association Premier League Ltd (FAPL) organised the filming of premier league matches and exercising television broadcasting rights. Those rights were awarded to broadcasters under an open competitive tender procedure. Each successful bidder undertook to prevent the public from receiving their broadcasts outside the area for which they held the licence. In the UK, however, certain restaurants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll