header-logo header-logo

05 March 2010
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

European Union—Freedom of movement—Right of residence

Teixeira v Lambeth London Borough Council and another C-480/08, [2010] All ER (D) 249 (Feb)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber),
23 February 2010

The Court of Justice of the European Union has given a preliminary ruling concerning the interpretation of Art 12 of Council Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 (on freedom of movement for workers within the Community, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) 2434/92) (Reg 1612/68), and of Parliament and Council Directive (EC) 2004/38 (on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states, amending Reg 1612/68) in relation to a claim for housing assistance.

Judges Skouris (President), Cunha Rodrigues, Lenaerts, Bonichot and Lindh (Presidents of Chambers), Timmermans, Rosas (Rapporteur), Schiemann, Kuris, Juhasz, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Arabadjiev
The claimant Portuguese national arrived in the UK in 1989 with her husband, also a Portuguese national. They worked in the UK from 1989 to 1991. Their daughter was born in the UK in June 1991. They later divorced but remained in the UK. After 1991 the claimant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll