header-logo header-logo

13 October 2017
Issue: 7765 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

European Union

Emerald Supplies Ltd and others v British Airways plc and other applications [2017] EWHC 2420 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 28 (Oct)

As a matter of law, the claimant air freight shippers could not claim, against British Airways and others, damages arising from an alleged cartel insofar as it affected freight charges between the European Union and third countries on flights before 1 May 2004 (namely the date on which air transport between the EU and third countries had been brought within the regime implementing the EU competition rules set out in Council Regulation 1/2003). The claimants had no reasonable grounds for bringing a claim, and/or no real prospect of succeeding on a claim, based on, among other things, the alleged infringement of Art 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of the charges for air freight services provided by parties to a cartel to which British Airways had been a party on routes between the European Union and third countries for transactions entered into prior to 1 May 2004. The Chancery Division so ruled in a determination on preliminary issues.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll