header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Value added tax

Wheels Common Investment Fund Trustees Ltd and other companies v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-424/11 [2013] All ER (D) 117 (Mar)

It was settled law that funds which constituted undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities within the meaning of Directive (EC) 2001/108 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 January 2002 (the UCITS Directive) were special investment funds. As was clear from Art 1(2) of that Directive, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities were undertakings which, such as AUTs and OEICs, had as their sole object, in accordance with the objective pursued by the exemption provided for in Art 13B(d)(6) of the Sixth Council Directive (EEC) 77/388 and Art 135(1)(g) of Council Directive (EC) 2006/112, the collective investment in transferable securities of capital raised from the public. Further, funds which, without being collective investment undertakings within the meaning of the UCITS Directive, displayed characteristics identical to theirs and thus carried out the same transactions or, at least, displayed features that were sufficiently comparable for them to be in competition with such undertakings should also be regarded as special investment funds. However,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll