header-logo header-logo

11 October 2013
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Insolvency—Debtor subject to insolvency proceedings

Van Buggenhout and another v Banque Internationale a Luxembourg SA C-251/12

Judges Ilešic (President) (Rapporteur), Jarašiunas, Ó Caoimh, Toader and Fernlund, and V. Tourrès, Administrator, 19 September 2013

Article 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings must be interpreted as meaning that a payment made at the behest of a debtor subject to insolvency proceedings to one of the latter’s creditors does not fall within the scope of that provision. 

The underlying dispute concerned a property development company which had its registered office in Antwerp, Belgium. In May 2006, an application to open insolvency proceedings was made in Brussels. Following that application, two cheques were issued for the benefit of the company by two of its debtor companies. Afterwards, the company appointed new directors and acquired a purchase option issued by a Panamanian company, “Kostner”. It opened two accounts with the respondent Luxembourg bank and transferred the cheques into one account then the other. The bank subsequently issued a cheque for Kostner in payment for the purchase option. In September 2006, the company’s liquidators demanded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll