header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

EU employment legacy

No matter what the future holds as regards the UK’s relationship with the EU, its legacy of employment law will continue for many years to come. So writes Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer at Mills & Reeve, in this week’s NLJ. From the law on collective redundancy consultation to minimum paid holidays to discrimination laws, the EU has been a major influence. This is less the case in certain areas, notably pay, rights on termination of employment and the law on industrial action.

If the UK follows the Norway model then EU employment law will continue to apply. However, this would require free movement of people to continue, which might be politically unacceptable for some. Many of these, says Pigott, “would involve some degree of restriction on the UK’s ability to re-shape its employment law”.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll