header-logo header-logo

13 October 2011
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

EU consumer conundrum

Lawyers voice concerns over new “common European sales” law

Lawyers have spoken out against plans to introduce a second tier of contract law across member states.

The new “common European sales” law, proposed by the European Commission this week, would supplement domestic contract law. The aim is to break down obstacles, such as divergent sales laws, which the Commission claims act as a costly hindrance to cross-border trade, particularly for small firms.

The Commission also claims that traders who are dissuaded from undertaking cross-border transactions due to contract law obstacles forgo at least €26bn in intra-EU trade every year. It estimates that 500 million consumers in Europe lose out on greater choice and lower prices because fewer firms make cross-border offers, particularly in smaller national markets.

Member states would be required to make the new EU law available for sale of goods contracts in which a consumer is involved, or where at least one party is a small or medium enterprise (SME). The law would apply only where contracting parties agree that it should.

However, lawyers fear the proposals could create extra legal complexity and effectively undermine consumer rights.

Vanessa Knapp at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer says: “The market seems to be pointing to other factors, like language barriers and VAT complexities, to account for any missed cross-border trade opportunities, rather than the absence of contract law uniformity.

“One additional concern for UK businesses is how the new proposals’ key principles of good faith and fair dealing, defined as a standard of conduct characterised by honesty, openness and consideration for the interests of the other party, reconcile with the UK principles of legal certainty and freedom of contract. Many businesses have not yet thought about the difficulties the proposals could bring.”

Peter Lodder QC, chairman of the Bar, said that the Council would continue to challenge the evidential need and legal basis for the implementation of such a contract law. “Different contract laws are not a high-priority for the vast majority of SMEs, particularly in the present economic climate,” he said. “What we can be certain of is that the European sales law will increase costs for all and lead to less certainty in law; a double whammy which is in nobody’s interests.”
 

Issue: 7485 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll