header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Broadcasting

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The concept of “communication to the public”, within the meaning of Art 3(1) of Directive (EC) 2001/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), should be interpreted as meaning that it covered a retransmission of the works included in a terrestrial television broadcast—where the retransmission is made by an organisation other than the original broadcaster—by means of an internet stream made available to the subscribers of that other organisation who might receive that retransmission by logging on to its server—even though those subscribers were within the area of reception of that terrestrial television broadcast and might lawfully receive the broadcast on a television receiver. It was not irrelevant that a “communication” within the meaning of Art 3(1) of the Directive was of a profit-making nature. However, a profit-making nature was not necessarily an essential condition for the existence of a communication to the public. Consequently, a profit-making nature did not determine conclusively whether a retransmission, such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll