header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Broadcasting

ITV Broadcasting Ltd and other companies v TVCatchup Ltd C-607/11, [2013] All ER (D) 116 (Mar)

The concept of “communication to the public”, within the meaning of Art 3(1) of Directive (EC) 2001/29 of the European Parliament and of the Council (on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society), should be interpreted as meaning that it covered a retransmission of the works included in a terrestrial television broadcast—where the retransmission is made by an organisation other than the original broadcaster—by means of an internet stream made available to the subscribers of that other organisation who might receive that retransmission by logging on to its server—even though those subscribers were within the area of reception of that terrestrial television broadcast and might lawfully receive the broadcast on a television receiver. It was not irrelevant that a “communication” within the meaning of Art 3(1) of the Directive was of a profit-making nature. However, a profit-making nature was not necessarily an essential condition for the existence of a communication to the public. Consequently, a profit-making nature did not determine conclusively whether a retransmission, such

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll