header-logo header-logo

02 August 2018 / Richard Buckley
Issue: 7804 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Damages
printer mail-detail

Escaping liability

nlj_7804_buckley

R A Buckley investigates breaking the chain of causation

  • When will an act of the claimant’s own choosing negate liability for a defendant’s breach of duty?

When will a defendant escape liability for negligence or other breach of duty on the ground that the actions of the claimant, in an endeavour to escape from a situation in which the defendant had placed him or her, ‘broke the chain of causation’ with the defendant’s original wrongful act? This question recently divided the Court of Appeal in Clay v TUI UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1177, [2018] All ER (D) 137 (May).

One evening, while on holiday in Tenerife, the claimant and his family went out on to the balcony of their hotel room, only to find themselves trapped when a defect in the lock on the door prevented them from re-entering the room. They tried for half an hour to attract attention, but without success. The claimant’s wife wished to visit the toilet, and they also began to become anxious about looking in on their children, who were asleep in another part of the hotel.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll