header-logo header-logo

01 January 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Escape from mortgage covenants

When non-compliance is alleged, can the undertaking be enforced by committal?

When an ancillary relief order recites in its preamble an undertaking to the court to use best endeavours to procure a mortgage release and non-compliance is alleged, can the undertaking be enforced by committal? If not, can an order be made for specific performance with a penal notice being attached?

The court has no greater powers to deal with breach of an undertaking than it has to deal with breach of an order (Gandolfo v Gandolfo (Standard Chartered Bank, Garnishee) [1981] QB 359, CA).

There is no power vested in a court dealing with an ancillary relief application to order a party to procure the other party’s release from mortgage covenants and so the court could not commit for breach of such an undertaking. Nevertheless, the breach of the undertaking would give rise to a cause of action in contract and separate civil proceedings would have to be initiated by the party with the benefit of the undertaking.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll