header-logo header-logo

Equity—Subrogation—Unjust enrichment

30 September 2010
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Anfield (UK) Ltd v Bank of Scotland plc [2010] EWHC 2374 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) (Sept)

Chancery Division, Proudman J, 24 Sept 2010

A lender who stipulates for a legal charge but who in fact obtains only an equitable charge due to his failure to register under the Land Registration Acts will, subject to fulfilment of all other relevant requirements, be entitled to be subrogated to an earlier legal charge that was discharged with his advance.

Richard Lander (instructed by Chandler Harris) for the claimant. Charlotte Eborall (instructed by Optima Legal Services Limited) for the first defendant.
The proceedings arose out of loans to the second defendant, a bankrupt, who was the registered proprietor of property in London (the property). The claimant was A Ltd and the first defendant was Bank of Scotland plc (the bank).

The bank advanced money to the second defendant to redeem a charge of 30 June 2000 in respect of the Halifax building society (the Halifax charge) and in September 2006 received in return an executed charge (the 2006 charge) capable of being registered as a legal charge.

The bank failed, however,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll