header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Dominic Thomas
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Environmental impact

Dominic Thomas explains why the demand for environmental insurance is on the increase

On 30 April 2007, the government is committed to implementing Directive 2004/35/EC on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. The Directive is based upon the ‘polluter pays’ principle, whereby polluters bear the cost of remediating the damage they cause to the environment, or the cost of measures to prevent imminent threat of damage. Crucially, the proposed Directive does not cover economic losses resulting from the damage, such as personal injury or property damage.

Controversial consultation

The Directive has been controversial from the outset. Its original wording obliged the European Commission (the Commission) to submit proposals for a harmonised compulsory financial guarantee for water and soil damage. However, concerns over cost implications meant that the requirement was dropped, but the issue is to be revisited in 2010 and is likely to be introduced eventually.

Even without compulsory guarantees, the consultation process for the Directive proved divisive. The green lobby, for instance, was critical that the proposed Directive did not cover economic damage and that polluters would have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll