header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Brooke Lyne
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Enforcing possession orders: clarity matters

Enforcing possession orders in the High Court: Brooke Lyne reviews the meaning of sufficient notice

  • Recent case law has provided important guidance for landlords looking to enforce possession orders in the High Court.

It is often the case that where a possession order has been granted by the County Court, a landlord may seek to expedite the eviction process by having the case transferred to the High Court for the purposes of enforcement under s 42, County Courts Act 1984. CPR 83.13 governs the procedure for High Court enforcement of possession orders. Generally (though not for trespassers or in mortgage possessions) permission is required to issue a writ of possession (CPR 83.13(2)). Permission will not be given unless: ‘every person in actual possession of the whole or any part of the land (‘the occupant’) has received such notice of the proceedings as appears to the court sufficient to enable the occupant to apply to the court for any relief to which the occupier may be entitled’ (CPR 83.13(8)(a)).

In Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch), [2016] All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll