header-logo header-logo

01 December 2017 / Brooke Lyne
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Enforcing possession orders: clarity matters

Enforcing possession orders in the High Court: Brooke Lyne reviews the meaning of sufficient notice

  • Recent case law has provided important guidance for landlords looking to enforce possession orders in the High Court.

It is often the case that where a possession order has been granted by the County Court, a landlord may seek to expedite the eviction process by having the case transferred to the High Court for the purposes of enforcement under s 42, County Courts Act 1984. CPR 83.13 governs the procedure for High Court enforcement of possession orders. Generally (though not for trespassers or in mortgage possessions) permission is required to issue a writ of possession (CPR 83.13(2)). Permission will not be given unless: ‘every person in actual possession of the whole or any part of the land (‘the occupant’) has received such notice of the proceedings as appears to the court sufficient to enable the occupant to apply to the court for any relief to which the occupier may be entitled’ (CPR 83.13(8)(a)).

In Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch), [2016] All ER

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll