header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / David Burrows
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Enforcement matters

Part 3: Do child support committal applications breach human rights? David Burrows reports

* * * * * *

The Child Support Agency (CSA), on behalf of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, is undertaking a “wave” (its word) of enforcement applications, and yet the committal application procedure under Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 39A is probably in breach of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Enforcement of payment of child support arrears derives from the liability order (CSA 1991 s 33: see NLJ, 6 March 2009, p 334 and NLJ, 20 March 2009, p 415). CSA 1991, s 39A(2)(a) enables magistrates, on application by the commission, to issue a warrant “committing [a] liable person to prison”. Thus the Commission can apply for imprisonment of a parent who is subject to a liability order.

CSA 1991, s 40(3) provides for disposal by the magistrates: “If, but only if, the court is of the opinion that there has been wilful refusal or culpable neglect on the part of the liable person it may (a) issue a warrant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll