header-logo header-logo

07 May 2009 / David Burrows
Issue: 7368 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Enforcement matters

Part 3: Do child support committal applications breach human rights? David Burrows reports

* * * * * *

The Child Support Agency (CSA), on behalf of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission, is undertaking a “wave” (its word) of enforcement applications, and yet the committal application procedure under Child Support Act 1991 (CSA 1991), s 39A is probably in breach of Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Enforcement of payment of child support arrears derives from the liability order (CSA 1991 s 33: see NLJ, 6 March 2009, p 334 and NLJ, 20 March 2009, p 415). CSA 1991, s 39A(2)(a) enables magistrates, on application by the commission, to issue a warrant “committing [a] liable person to prison”. Thus the Commission can apply for imprisonment of a parent who is subject to a liability order.

CSA 1991, s 40(3) provides for disposal by the magistrates: “If, but only if, the court is of the opinion that there has been wilful refusal or culpable neglect on the part of the liable person it may (a) issue a warrant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll