header-logo header-logo

12 February 2025
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Legal News , Health , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

End of Life Bill drops High Court approval

An expert panel rather than a High Court judge would provide safeguards under the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which is now at the committee stage.

Previously, the Bill specified that a High Court judge would sign off applications once doctors’ consent was obtained.

However, Kim Leadbeater MP, sponsor of the Bill, said this week she will propose an amendment to create a ‘voluntary assisted dying commission’, chaired by a High Court judge or a former senior judge. The commission ‘would then authorise expert panels to look at every application for an assisted death.

‘Those panels would have a legal chair, but also include a psychiatrist and a social worker, who will bring their own expertise in assessing mental capacity and identifying any risk of coercion’.

The Law Society has stressed the need for ‘robust, accessible and independent safeguards’ including proper resourcing for the High Court to deal with the extra workload and the provision of non-means-tested legal aid to ensure adequate legal advice and representation.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll