header-logo header-logo

29 April 2016 / David Branson
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

End of a century (Pt 2)

nlj_7696_branson

In the second part of a two part series, David Branson reports on the end of a century old overlap between civil and criminal liability in health and safety

The first article in this series highlighted the end of the century old overlap between civil and criminal liability in health and safety following the implementation of s 69(3) of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 (see “End of a century (Pt 1)”, NLJ, 25 March & 1 April 2016, p 10).

We should also note the impact of reg 21 of the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999. This was introduced following the case of R v Nelson Group Services (Maintenance) Ltd [1999] IRLR 646, [1998] 4 All ER 331 where the employer was held not liable for the failings of his employees which had led to a breach of health and safety duties under the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994/1886). The employer had argued that the employees had failed to follow the training provided and so he was not liable for their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll