header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / David Branson
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Features , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

End of a century (Pt 1)

001_nlj_7692_branson

In the first of a two-part series, David Branson reports on the end of a century old overlap between civil & criminal liability in health & safety

The implementation of s 69(3) of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 now means that persons injured at work are no longer able to sue in respect of a breach of the employer’s statutory duties under health and safety regulations. As such, this has ended a century old overlap between civil and criminal liability in health and safety, whereby the same safety regulations provided for an action by both an injured party and the regulatory authorities.

There is now a clear split between civil and criminal liability in this area. Civil liability is effectively based on common law negligence, stemming from the principles laid down in the leading case of Wilsons and Clyde Coal v English [1938] AC 57, [1937] 3 All ER 628, and then developed in subsequent cases. There still remains a limited ability to claim under statutes such as the Occupiers Liability Act 1957, although this does not really differ much from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll