header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Employment—Unfair dismissal—Date of dismissal

Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41, [2010] All ER (D) 124 (Oct)

Supreme Court Lord Hope DP, Lord Saville, Lord Walker, Lady Hale and Lord Kerr SCJJ, 13 Oct 2010

Under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), the effective date of termination of employment is when the employee is informed of the dismissal or when the employee has had a reasonable opportunity of discovering that she has been dismissed. Consideration of the behaviour of the employee should be included in an assessment of whether the employee has had a reasonable opportunity to find out about the dismissal.

Paul Greatorex (instructed by Richard C Hall & partners) for the appellant The respondent did not appear and was not represented..

In October 2006, the respondent was suspended from her employment. A disciplinary hearing was held on 28 November 2006. At the end of the hearing, the respondent was told that she could expect to receive a letter on 30 November informing her of the outcome of the hearing (the decision letter). On 30 November, however, the respondent travelled to London to see her sister who

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll