header-logo header-logo

Employment Rights Bill: what’s next?

228914
As the Bill nears the end of its journey in the Lords, Charles Pigott predicts its future
  • After a quiet committee stage, the Employment Rights Bill had a more tempestuous report stage, with government amendments that affect non-disclosure agreements, bereavement leave, fire and re-hire measures, and zero-hours and low-hours workers.
  • The first wave of measures will take effect on 6 April 2026. But day-one unfair dismissal rights and new protections for zero-hours and reduced-hours workers will be deferred until 2027.

The Employment Rights Bill completed its report stage in the House of Lords on 23 July. After a highly technical committee stage, more substantive amendments were passed at the report stage, including some non-government amendments. The third reading took place on 3 September, and the Bill will now return to the Commons for the Lords’ amendments to be considered.

A quiet committee stage

When the lengthy committee stage ended on 24 June after ten days of sittings, it was widely assumed that the Bill was nearing its final form, with no significant amendments expected.

The reprinted Bill

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll