header-logo header-logo

08 July 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment matters: the same but different?

nlj_7706_comment_pigott

It’s au revoir but not adieu to EU employment law, says Charles Pigott

The way the EU referendum was framed, and the manner in which the leave campaign was conducted, has left us with no clear idea of how the exit negotiations will be handled. It will probably take another general election to tell us that – if the EU is prepared to give us that much time. Without knowing which of the various options will be chosen – ranging from the Norway model to falling back on WTO rules – it is difficult to assess the likely impact on our employment law.

We do, however, know the starting point for the journey—our current body of employment law. The ambitions of the EU and the extent of its legislative competence are now set out in the Social Policy Chapter of the Treaty of Lisbon. That and its predecessors have, among many other things, given us TUPE, our laws on collective redundancy consultation and our rules on working time and minimum paid holidays. The EU has also had a major

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll