header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law briefing: 27 April 2007

DTI gets egg on its face, The Gibbons review, What should replace abandoned statutory procedures?

On a Thursday towards the end of March, your humble author was speaking at an employment law conference in London, giving the session on the statutory dismissal and grievance procedures, castigating them thoroughly, but giving the prediction that they would not be abandoned because of the amount of egg-on-face for the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), which had been so keen to impose them. At that exact moment, the DTI announced that the procedures were to be repealed completely.

Given this unerring accuracy and sense of timing on my part, giving me my new official position as Jonah to the world of employment law, I invite readers to write in to me with employment laws that they would love to see go so that I can arrange to speak on them, thus triggering this uncanny reaction from the DTI. Actually, as a list of such laws is likely to be unmanageable, please do not do this.

REPEAL OF THE PROCEDURES

In spite of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll