header-logo header-logo

07 October 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7859 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 October 2019

This month, Ian Smith runs with some classic arguments on worker status & gives a nod to national stereotypes
  • No general right to holiday pay for all non-standard doctors.
  • Working time rights—the meaning of ‘refuse’.
  • The meek shall inherit, if not the world, at least a higher level of compensation.

There have been two employment-related cases featuring in the press recently which are considered here at the beginning and end of this brief. Other cases considered involved dismissal for refusing to work contrary to working time laws, timing as a factor in the definition of disability and injury to feelings damages in discrimination claims.

The first newsworthy case was the decision of Kerr J in Community Based Care Health Ltd v Narayan UKEAT/0162/18,the latest in a series of cases concerning whether doctors operating outside the classic GP surgery model can claim to be ‘workers’. The result (in the doctor’s favour) caused speculation in the press about potential costs to the NHS, but it may not be as simple as suggested.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll