header-logo header-logo

04 July 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 4 July 2019

Ian Smith applauds some recent performances by the Court of Appeal but pans the non-statutory antics of some members of the supporting cast

  • Sorting out a glitch about voluntary overtime.
  • Offers by employers to give up collective bargaining.
  • Perceived disability that the claimant might develop the condition.
  • Remedies for unfair dismissal—a narrow escape

Several years ago, one lord justice commented that he had always thought that slavery had been abolished in Britain until he was appointed to the Court of Appeal. That court has certainly been busy with employment cases in the last month, in four cases spread right across the subject. They have corrected a potentially major gaffe by the ECJ (in a suitably to-the-point judgment), given the first authoritative interpretation to a provision of collective labour law introduced 15 years ago, extended the scope of perceived disability to cases where the employer wrongly believed that the employee might develop a particular condition, and lastly stamped on an attempt to graft a non-statutory remedy on to the statutory action for unfair dismissal. Not a bad bag.

Voluntary overtime

When East

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll