header-logo header-logo

12 August 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7991 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 August 2022

90406
Common law under attack? Ian Smith reports on the latest cases from the Court of Appeal & a particularly busy spell for Lord Justice Bean & Lady Justice Simler
  • No limit on the power to terminate on proper notice.
  • Upholding the ‘least burdensome’ principle.
  • Explaining the separability principle.

The last month has seen two awaited decisions of the Supreme Court, in Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21, [2022] All ER (D) 72 (Jul) on the statutory holiday pay entitlement of a part-year (as opposed to a part-time) worker, and in Basfar v Wong [2022] UKSC 20, [2022] All ER (D) 15 (Jul) on the application of diplomatic immunity in cases of alleged modern slavery (also of interest as it is the first leapfrog appeal from the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) directly to the Supreme Court). These will doubtless be debated elsewhere. The cases considered in this brief were at Court of Appeal level and considered important principles of the common law of employment which in one way or another were under attack. My old chambers colleagues and leading

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll