header-logo header-logo

14 January 2022 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 14 January 2022

68398
To kick off the new year, Ian Smith serves up a selection of delights including the role of fairness, the impact of the ACAS uplift & the relevance of gross misconduct in unfair dismissal claims
  • A new implied term of fairness in operating procedures?
  • Applying the ACAS uplift—the proper approach.
  • The relevance of gross misconduct in an unfair dismissal claim.

The three cases considered in this brief are all important in well-known areas of employment law. In the first the Court of Appeal have laid the groundwork for a new stand-alone implied term that an employer will apply a disciplinary procedure fairly. Although this is obiter, it is highly likely that it will be pursued in a case where it’s directly relevant, and sooner rather than later. In the second case the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has laid down guidance to employment tribunals (ETs) in deciding on whether to apply the uplift for failure to abide by the ACAS Code of Practice and, crucially, by how much. This is done in such a concise and tabulated way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll