header-logo header-logo

08 March 2018 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7784 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 8 March 2018

nlj_7784_smith

At last! Ian Smith brings clarity & some common sense to working hours, terms & divisions

  • Statutory rights for agency workers.
  • Employer knowledge and opinion.
  • Division, practice & procedure.

Clarification is the name of the game in the three cases covered in this update:

(i) that an agency worker’s statutory rights to (certain) equal terms cannot be bought out by paying a higher hourly rate (but also that the phrase ‘duration of working time’ does not mean that the agency worker must be hired to work the same number of hours as a permanent worker);

(ii) that an employer in a disability case may reasonably rely on advice from an occupational health or other similar department, as long as it does not just rubber stamp it; and

(iii) that a contract action brought before a tribunal under the Extension of Jurisdiction Order must be against the employer itself, not some other party. In a sense, all of these seem fairly obvious but, although the decisions all come down on that common sense side, the arguments in them show

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll