header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment Law Brief: 22 May 2008

illegality and tax status
burden of proof and automatic unfairness
protection from harassment

Several years ago, one learned lord justice said extra-judicially that he had always thought that slavery had been abolished in this country until he had been appointed to the Court of Appeal. That sentiment has perhaps been borne out in the employment law sphere with a sudden rush of cases in that court in the last month.

In Kalwak and another v Consistent Group Ltd  [2008] EWCA Civ 430, [2008] All ER (D) 394 (Apr) the court overturned a well known decision of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) extending employment status (and hence protection) to Polish workers imported into this country by an agency whose documentation then went out of its way to deny any employment relationship. The decision was largely because of defective reasoning by the tribunal and the result was that the case was remitted for a rehearing (which will be interesting).

In Amicus and others v Dynamex Friction Ltd and another [2008] EWCA Civ 381, [2008] All ER (D) 251 (Apr) the court had to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll