header-logo header-logo

17 August 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 17 August 2016

Following the EU referendum, Ian Smith advises employment lawyers to keep calm & carry on

  • CJEU pronouncements on potentially important aspects of working time/annual leave law.
  • The effect of a successful appeal against dismissal.
  • Whose mind/motivation is to be imputed to the employer in a case of dismissal?

The more perceptive reader may have noticed certain political developments in the last couple of months that could have an impact in the future on our employment law. The key point at the moment is the word “future” because no-one knows how this will all eventually pan out, let alone when. From a purely legal point of view, the position currently is simple—nothing changes purely as a result of the referendum. The UK remains a full member of the EU, Directives continue to apply and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) retains its jurisdiction. Even when things start to change, we must bear in mind that (i) much of existing statutory employment law is home-grown anyway, (ii) the remaining element which comes from EU Directives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll