header-logo header-logo

24 July 2014 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7616 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 24 July 2014

employment_smith_0_0

Ian Smith considers the latest employment law developments

In a month which saw newsworthy employment law innovations on the legislative front relating to the extension of flexible working requests to any employee with six months’ service (not just those caring for the young) and planned moves to ban exclusivity clauses in nil-hours contracts, the case law selected here reflects a rather standard issue in employment law, namely the interaction between the major statutory rights and their common law bases. They cover the law on penalty clauses in employment contracts, affirmation of contract by the employee in the face of employer repudiation, how final warnings operate when there has been a lapse in the timing and finally how the common law defence of illegality applies where the allegation is one of harassment.

Penalty clause or liquidated damage clause?

In Li v First Marine Solutions Ltd UKEAT/0045/13, a question arose as to whether a clause in the departing employee’s contract constituted an enforceable liquidated damages clause or an unenforceable penalty clause. The matter arose on the facts because the employee (claiming to have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll