header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 12 December 2025

12 December 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8143 / Categories: Features , Employment , Whistleblowing , Liability
printer mail-detail
238294
In the spirit of togetherness, Ian Smith rounds off the year with a look at precedent across the UK jurisdictions, umbrella companies & vicarious liability
  • The Supreme Court held that appellate courts across the UK should show respect but not deference to decisions from other jurisdictions.
  • The Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that umbrella company employment arrangements can be genuine and enforceable.
  • The Court of Appeal was bound to follow precedent in allowing employers to be vicariously liable for detriments amounting to dismissal by fellow employees.

Employment law is usually quite well insulated from the remainder of civil law, but occasionally a case in another area has knock-on effects. This has happened this last month with the decision of the Supreme Court in R (on the application of Jwanczuk) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2025] UKSC 42, which actually concerned social security law, but in which the court took the opportunity to review the whole question of the relationship between the superior courts of the three separate jurisdictions of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll