header-logo header-logo

07 February 2019 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7827 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 7 February 2019

Ian Smith serves up a turbo-charged, non-biased update on recent case law & substantive procedural matters

  • ASDA Stores (1): the comparison point. ASDA Stores (2): the procedural point.
  • Extension of time for appealing to the EAT: computer problems and ill health.
  • Apparent bias at ET hearing.
  • Much of the case development in recent employment law has concerned mainstream substantive matters such as employment/worker status and contractual and statutory rights on dismissal. However, for a change the four cases (three Court of Appeal and one Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)) considered this month show that other substantive areas and procedural matters must not be overlooked, even if they may seem at times to have gone to sleep. The first two concern the same litigation—namely the ‘ASDA cases’ on equal pay—the third is a Court of Appeal case on extension of time for appealing to the EAT, and the fourth is an EAT case on when robust exchanges between Bench and Bar do and (more importantly) do not constitute apparent bias.

    Comparison matters

    In the group action

    If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
    If you are already a subscriber sign in
    ...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    Anthony Collins—20 promotions

    20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

    Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

    Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

    NEWS
    The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
    Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
    Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
    Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
    A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
    back-to-top-scroll