header-logo header-logo

05 February 2020 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7873 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 5 February 2020

15314
Sent packing? Ian Smith says there’s life after Brexit for unfair dismissal claims
  • Unfair dismissal & human rights.
  • Reasonable investigation in general and investigatory hearings.
  • Applying the correct test for contributory fault.

At the end of a month that culminated with our departure from the EU at the macro end of the scale, it is perhaps comforting that, not only does life go on but, at the micro end, the case law during it has concentrated on some of the eternal verities of the almost immutable law of unfair dismissal, which has been with us since the Industrial Relations Act 1971 and has suffered since then from remarkably little change in the basic legislation.

Unfair dismissal & human rights

The key point in Q v Secretary of State for Justice UKEAT/0120/19before Judge Auerbach is the affirmation of the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Turner v East Midlands Trains Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1470 , [2013] IRLR 107, [2013] 3 All ER 375 that the range of reasonable responses test for unfair dismissal is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll