header-logo header-logo

15 September 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8040 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 15 September 2023

137530
Ian Smith tackles the latest on TUPE transfers & the importance of knowing the rules in misconduct cases
  • The date of transfer where there is a series of transactions.
  • Transferability of a share incentive plan on a relevant transfer.
  • The importance of specifying disciplinary rules in a misconduct case.

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (TUPE) have been with us for 42 years, but their one-size-fits-all approach to the myriad of problems that can arise from all sorts of business transfers means that we still get cases either raising novel points or crossing t’s and dotting i’s on otherwise established rules. The last month has seen an example of each—the first in relation to how to determine the date of the transfer where it has been effected by a series of transactions over a considerable period of time; and the second in relation to the meaning of the transfer of rights and obligations arising not just under the contract of employment, but more widely in connection with the contract. The other case considered here was widely reported

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll