header-logo header-logo

11 August 2023 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 11 August 2023

133399
Before taking refuge in his beach hut, Ian Smith serves up a summer smorgasbord of Parliament, bias & demotion
  • Restricted rights in disciplinary hearings.
  • Continuation of the employment relationship; applying Hogg v Dover College.
  • Apparent bias and post-hearing conduct of a side member.

It has been a busy month on the legislative front. First, the Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act 2023 came into force on 24 July. It operates entirely by way of amendments to the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996).

Secondly, the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023 received royal assent. Its changes to existing law are that the employer will have to deal with a request within two months (unless an extension is agreed); an employee will be able to make two requests within a 12-month period; the employer will not be able to refuse a request until it has consulted the employee; and the employee will no longer have to explain what effects they think the change would have and how they might be dealt with. As Daniel Barnett pointed out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll