header-logo header-logo

14 March 2008
Issue: 7312 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

EMPLOYMENT LAW

Webb v Airbus UK Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 49, [2008] All ER (D) 94 (Feb)

Under s 98(4) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), it is open to a tribunal to find that a dismissal for misconduct was fair, even though the employer took account of the employee’s previous similar misconduct, which had been the subject of an expired final warning.

The question to be determined under s 98(4) is whether or not the employer had acted reasonably or unreasonably in treating the reason for dismissal as a sufficient reason for dismissing the employee. The fact that the warning had expired did not make the earlier misconduct an irrelevant circumstance under s 98(4).

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll