header-logo header-logo

21 January 2010 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The employment jigsaw

Ian Smith examines religious & philosophical conundrums & provides some light relief

The bulk of this month’s column (written while snowed in here in British East Suffolk,  trying to decide whether to send my wife out to the store in the next village on a long rope or to eat the cat) is taken up with two important and newsworthy cases on religion/belief discrimination, both as to its “reach” (in particular, what is a philosophical belief worthy of legal protection?), but also (in the first case) as to how the potentially contradictory laws on religious discrimination and sexual orientation discrimination fit together.

In a sense, this is only the legal tip of a larger social and political iceberg—we are seeing the enormous problems the Church of England is having in relation to gay clergy, and recently the BBC suddenly found itself caught up in a storm of criticism over a blog discussion on proposals in an African country to criminalise homosexual activity. One problem with the latter issue was that opening up discussion gave rise to a large amount of the “wrong” opinion pouring forth,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll