header-logo header-logo

02 November 2012
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment—Equality of treatment of men and women—Equal pay for equal work

Birmingham City Council v Abdulla and others [2012] UKSC 47

Supreme Court, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath, 24 October 2012

On the true construction of the first part of s 2(3) of the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970) and s 128(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), a claim in respect of the operation of an equality clause can never be more conveniently disposed of by the tribunal if it would thereby be time-barred.

Andrew Short QC and Naomi Ling (instructed by Leigh Day & Co) for the claimants. Paul Espstein QC, Louise Chudleigh and Nathan Caiden (instructed by Birmingham City Council Legal and Democratic Services) for the authority.

The claimants were formerly employed by the defendant local authority and were mostly women. They brought an equal pay claim against the authority in the High Court. The claims would have been out of time had they been issued in the employment tribunal, but within time in the High Court. Section 2(3)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll